[ODE] 0.8.2 candidate
b.stolk at gmail.com
Thu Sep 27 10:13:15 MST 2007
On 9/27/07, Jason Perkins <starkos at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/27/07, Bram Stolk <b.stolk at gmail.com> wrote:
> > We need to release a candidate for 0.8.2
> I will get to it ASAP, and I will label it 0.8.2...but I'm going to
let you handle all of the inevitable "where's 0.8.1?" questions. :)
After I have answered it 3 times in this list, I will make it a faq.
Let's see if it gets to be a faq entry :-)
I realize version numbers are more or less arbitrary, but is there
> some rationale behind adding another digit instead of going to 0.9?
> (0.5 -> 0.6 -> 0.7 -> 0.8 -> 0.8.2 ??)
Well, the rationale is that it leaves us some space to 1.0 ?
We can go to 0.9 if you prefer that.
The long list of changes may warrant a higher bump in version?
1.0 sounds like a good version nr for a really stable, proven and
2.0 would be the thing to use once we break API compatibility.
Did ODE ever break API compatibility before? If we do, we get to clean up
this ugly convention of adding a '2' to several functions if they behave
slightly different. Yuck!
Zapp: Captain's log, stardate...er..
Kif: Ohhh. April 13th.
Zapp: April 13th. Point 2.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ODE