[ODE] Bullet Integration
logreg at free.fr
Mon Feb 26 03:19:12 MST 2007
Just for say that i can easily test the bullet integration, with the
Marilou Robotics Studio samples : there some middle complex worlds in
Do not hesitate ...
As Marilou RC is within 5 months, i can build-rebuil-rerererebuild with the
new odelibraries and test ... :)
Director, Product Development
+33 (0)6 09 31 72 14
126 rue Paul Fort, no 2, 34130 Mauguio, France
Get the latest Marilou Robotics Studio version at
De : ode-bounces at ode.org [mailto:ode-bounces at ode.org] De la part de
erwin at erwincoumans.com
Envoyé : dimanche 25 février 2007 18:52
À : David Walters
Cc : ODE Mailing List (E-mail)
Objet : Re: [ODE] Bullet Integration
Thanks for expressing some interest. It is a matter of priorities indeed,
and there has been very little feedback from the ODE community so far.
There is no real changes needed to ODE. The idea is to add the collision
detection part of Bullet, which provides an alternative to OPCODE and
provides the full collision matrix using GJK.
The main issues to be resolved are proving a ODE-style C interface to
Bullet. Bullet provides all algorithms (compressed aabb tree, sweep and
prune broadphase, and persistent contact point management) and it would be
best to create a 'PersistentSpace'.
It helps if some ODE users (David?) familiarize with the Bullet library, and
have some more discussion about the integration (either on this mailing
list, or on the Bullet physics forum).
David Walters writes:
> Jason wrote [20-Dec-2006]:
> "Erwin Coumans would like to start working on integrating ODE and the
> Bullet continuous collision library. Since this work might take a
> while, I believe it makes sense to push out a new release of ODE
> before he starts. ..."
> I'm still quite excited about integration of the Bullet library into
> ODE, however it's been a while since we last heard anything about this
> and I'm wondering if there's anything anyone can do to help speed
> things up?
> I understand that Erwin is probably the best person to do the
> integration, but maybe there is something that others could help with
> and I don't think anyone has ever openly asked this question .... so
> I'm sending this e-mail to at the very least try to show support for
> this new feature.
> David Walters
> ODE mailing list
> ODE at ode.org
ODE mailing list
ODE at ode.org
More information about the ODE