[ODE] About "malloc" patch

[Jani Kajala]

> you want to reimplement it using auto_ptr, go for it!

No STL, Boost, etc. dependencies, please, ever. :)


Regards,
Jani

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeffrey Smith" <jeffreys at Softimage.com>
To: "ODE Mailing List (E-mail)" <ode at q12.org>
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 6:07 PM
Subject: RE: [ODE] About "malloc" patch


> Anton Savin wrote:
> > I suppose this is what is called "a patch that enables use of dynamic
> > memory". But who is shure that it's bug free? 
> 
> I'm fairly sure, but until I can run Purify on the code (soon) I won't
> be positive.  If you find any bugs, let me know right away.
> 
> > Has actually anyone tested all these code paths?
> 
> As far as possible, I've tested all the code paths (the code is
> actually pretty simple, structurally).
> 
> > Shortly, why not use smart pointers?
> 
> That's the plan; this implementation was a just temporary measure.  If
> you want to reimplement it using auto_ptr, go for it!
> 
> -jeff
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ODE mailing list
> ODE at q12.org
> http://q12.org/mailman/listinfo/ode