[ODE] XML ODE Data Interchange Format (revision 6)

Shaul Kedem shaul_kedem at yahoo.com
Mon Mar 15 22:23:35 MST 2004


Will,
 I was against the comma delmited idea to start with,
but as a compromise I thought we should at least take
out the new lines, so basically not having free CDATA
sections is best,

Shaul

--- William Denniss <lists at omegadelta.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 01:28, Shaul Kedem wrote:
> > Hi (yet again),
> > 
> >  Two more things (if anyone thinks I am hammering
> Will
> > here he is wrong, I simply started making an XML
> > schema for XoDE):
> 
> keep hammering away - better to get it right the
> first time :)
> 
> >  - The transformstyle attribute in the world
> element,
> > although this might be benefitial for performance,
> it
> > will not be enforced by the schema.
> 
> I am very aware of that - but we have a situation
> were even if the XML
> is "valid" - it can still be non-conforming to the
> XODE standard.
> 
> For example you suggested using a format which
> cannot be validated by a
> schema either (when talking about the CDATA for
> comma delimited arrays).
> 
> >  - The "rotation" element in the transform tag
> example
> > contains roll,pitch and yaw while in the example
> it
> > contains x,y,z. I suggest going with x,y,z since
> the
> > rotation element should be (preferably, its not a
> > must) the same throughout the XODE protocol.
> 
> There are a few typos due to copying and pasting -
> thanks for picking
> that one up.  As you said it makes little
> difference.
> 
> Will.
> 
> -- 
> William Denniss - will@ http://tanksoftware.com/
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com


More information about the ODE mailing list