Managed Wrapper (was: RE: [ODE] My ODE++)
hplus-ode at mindcontrol.org
Fri Jan 9 09:37:32 MST 2004
Perhaps you can elaborate? In case you lost the context, here's a summary:
- Someone was saying that a better C++ wrapper might make writing a managed ("CLR" "DOTNET" etc) API for ODE easier.
- I replied that I had written a managed API that's richer than the current wrapper available in contrib, and I described the approach I took, including wrapping using Managed DirectX APIs to reduce impedance.
- Someone replied that tieing the managed API to DirectX precluded other platforms from using the managed wrapper.
- The only other platform that could conceivably use that would be "DOTGNU" running under Linux, and, honestly, it's not currently anything I'd base a production-worthy effort on, which is what my joke was about. It seems that you were trying to prove that there are production efforts using DOTGNU on Linux, but I fail to see how your links apply.
From: ode-bounces at q12.org [mailto:ode-bounces at q12.org]On Behalf Of ken
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 2:53 AM
To: ode at q12.org
Subject: Re: [ODE] My ODE++
Jon Watte wrote:
> Ah, yes, that large, clearly defined market of graphics-intensive
> applications using the CLR runtime environment on Linux. I totally forgot
> about those two guys :-)
Maybe you should inform Pixar
and Industrial Light and Magic.
That they should ditch their 'CLR runtime environment' and 'upgrade'
ODE mailing list
ODE at q12.org
More information about the ODE